Thursday, February 20, 2014
Researchers Resist Pressure to Show Impact of Their Work
February 9, 2014
Aisha Labi, Chronicle of Higher Education
A few years ago, Philip Moriarty, a professor of physics at the University of Nottingham, had had enough. Mr. Moriarty was a member of a peer-review body for the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, one of the agencies in Britain that control the purse strings of academic research. In 2009 the council began to require that applicants for grants include a "pathways to impact" statement outlining the potential economic and societal effects of their work and who might benefit from it and how. The professor objected, and eventually he said he would no longer review applications. "I said it would be unconscionable to take part in the process," he says.
Mr. Moriarty is one of a growing chorus of British academics troubled by the extent to which publicly financed research is now required to demonstrate its economic impact and value to society and how that emphasis may steer the direction of research. Read more
Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Poli Sci Victory, For Now
Janaury 24, 2014
Michael Stratford, Inside Higher Ed
Supporters of social science breathed a sigh of relief last week when Congress effectively repealed strict limits on how the National Science Foundation could fund certain types of political science research.
The omnibus appropriations bill that Congress passed and the President signed into law last week did not include the controversial provision that had, for more than nine months, restricted NSF funding for political science to only projects that directly promoted national security and U.S. economic interests. Read more
Michael Stratford, Inside Higher Ed
Supporters of social science breathed a sigh of relief last week when Congress effectively repealed strict limits on how the National Science Foundation could fund certain types of political science research.
The omnibus appropriations bill that Congress passed and the President signed into law last week did not include the controversial provision that had, for more than nine months, restricted NSF funding for political science to only projects that directly promoted national security and U.S. economic interests. Read more
Tuesday, February 4, 2014
New Reforms to Federal Grant Policies
January 17, 2014
Sally Rockey, National Institutes of Health Rock Talk Blog
In February last year I blogged
about the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)’s request for comments on
proposed federal grant policy reforms. These policies, contained in multiple
documents known as circulars, contain Fed-wide regulations on spending, not
just for research grants. Many grantees and stakeholder organizations came
forth and contributed comments. This information was taken into account by OMB
to bring a number of these changes into fruition. The new guidance, “Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards”, was announced by OMB in December as one consolidated
omnicircular. Here are just a few highlights: Read more
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)